National Defence

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss contaminated sites managed by the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces. The meeting focused on specific issues in Shannon, Quebec, and Terrebonne, Quebec. Witnesses included Sarah Perreault, the mayor of Shannon, and Serge Villandré, the chief administrative officer of Terrebonne. Mayor Perreault spoke about trichloroethylene (TCE) contamination in Shannon from 26 years ago, noting that while a water system was installed to address it, the ground remains contaminated. She highlighted the difficulties in working with National Defence due to its hierarchical structure and the challenges Shannon faces with unexploded ammunition on adjacent land. She also mentioned a lack of communication regarding a project to build 1,100 housing units in Shannon, and the financial impact of the military base on the town. Serge Villandré discussed the former Saint-Maurice test shooting range in Terrebonne, which is contaminated with unexploded ammunition. He emphasized the ecological value of the land and the need for decontamination to allow for community use and development, including building schools and an industrial park. Villandré stated that the City of Terrebonne had to spend $1.7 million to decontaminate part of the site for an interchange project and argued that the federal government should take responsibility for the full decontamination and compensate the city. Committee members questioned the witnesses about the extent of the contamination, the impact on property values and development, and the communication between the municipalities and National Defence. The committee acknowledged the need for improved communication and collaboration between the federal government and municipalities to address contaminated sites and support community development.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss the Defence Investment Agency (DIA) and its role in modernizing Canada's defence procurement system. Doug Guzman, the DIA's chief executive officer, explained the agency's goal is to streamline how Canada buys military equipment and ensure investments benefit the Canadian economy. He highlighted the agency's focus on building domestic capabilities, partnering with allies, and buying efficiently, emphasizing a "build-partner-buy" approach. Guzman also addressed concerns about potential conflicts of interest due to his past business dealings, assuring the committee that processes are in place to prevent favouritism. Committee members questioned Guzman on his lack of direct defence experience and how the DIA would ensure transparency and accountability in its procurement processes. Committee members explored how the DIA would integrate Canadian innovation, particularly from sectors like mining, into defence procurement. Guzman explained that the DIA would score proposals based on Canadian content, job creation, and technology transfer. He also mentioned the importance of identifying and supporting sovereign capabilities within Canada's defence industry. The committee also discussed how the DIA would work with other departments, such as National Defence and Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, to avoid duplication and ensure clear lines of responsibility. Guzman acknowledged past reform attempts and stressed the need for relentless pursuit of change. Several committee members raised concerns about the DIA's ability to balance speed and rigour in procurement, as well as ensuring Canadian sovereignty in defence capabilities. Guzman and his team emphasized the importance of early engagement with industry, streamlined processes, and a focus on Canadian content in procurement decisions. They also highlighted the DIA's efforts to accelerate procurement timelines and reduce reliance on foreign sources. The committee also discussed the DIA's budget, staffing, and security protocols. The committee requested additional information in writing on several topics, including the criteria for medium- and high-risk projects and the steps taken for security screening of DIA personnel. The committee explored the DIA's role in promoting Canadian defence exports and ensuring that these exports do not fall into the hands of hostile powers. Guzman emphasized the importance of evaluating each situation on a case-by-case basis and adhering to Canadian laws and values. The committee also discussed the DIA's plans to support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the defence sector and to foster innovation in Canadian defence capabilities. The committee also discussed the DIA's plans to support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the defence sector and to foster innovation in Canadian defence capabilities. The committee meeting concluded with a discussion of the DIA's key performance indicators (KPIs) and its commitment to transparency and accountability. Guzman committed to providing regular updates to the committee on the DIA's progress and performance. The committee members thanked Guzman and his team for their testimony and wished them well in their efforts to modernize Canada's defence procurement system.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss the experiences of Francophone and Indigenous members in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF). Witnesses shared their experiences and suggestions for improvements. The committee heard that while Francophones are overrepresented in the CAF compared to the general population, they often face challenges using French in the workplace and accessing services in their preferred language. Indigenous members also face systemic barriers and may feel pressured to hide their identity. Stéphanie Chouinard, a professor at the Royal Military College of Canada, emphasized the need for a cultural shift within the CAF to embrace official languages, with increased opportunities for Anglophone members to learn and use French. Retired Captain Hélène Le Scelleur spoke about her experiences as a Francophone and Indigenous woman in the CAF, highlighting challenges in training, access to services (especially mental health care), and career progression. Lieutenant-General Michel Maisonneuve (Ret'd) stressed the importance of bilingualism as a leadership issue and a national advantage, advocating for increased language training and a greater emphasis on respect for both official languages. Eric Sauvé, a former officer, shared solutions from other Francophone members, emphasizing the need to address the double standard in language expectations and provide adequate resources for language training. Committee members discussed the challenges faced by Francophone soldiers working outside of Quebec, the need for better language training programs, and the impact of the CAF's restructuring on Francophone units. Witnesses recommended making full career training available in both official languages, guaranteeing immediate access to health services in the preferred language, and conditioning promotions on the equitable application of language requirements. They also emphasized the importance of leadership, accountability, and creating a supportive environment for Francophone and Indigenous members and their families. Witnesses generally agreed that while there have been improvements over time, significant gaps remain in ensuring equitable treatment and opportunities for Francophone and Indigenous members of the CAF. They stressed the need for a cultural shift, increased resources for language training, and greater accountability to ensure that policies are effectively implemented. The committee will use the testimony to inform its report and recommendations to the government. Several witnesses expressed concerns about proposed law C-11, suggesting the importance of choice for members to use the military or civilian system, especially in cases of trauma.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss the experiences of Francophone and Indigenous members within the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF). Witnesses included academics and historians specializing in military personnel, Indigenous military history, and northern studies. The discussion covered recruitment, retention, organizational culture, and the role of the Canadian Rangers. Committee members explored challenges and potential improvements to better support and integrate these groups into the CAF. Grazia Scoppio highlighted that while Indigenous representation in the CAF is increasing, it still falls below recruiting goals and the overall Indigenous population in Canada. She pointed out issues with the slowness of the recruiting system and cultural challenges within the CAF that lead to early attrition. Danielle Teillet provided a historical overview, noting past discrimination and unequal treatment of Indigenous veterans. She emphasized the importance of understanding this history to address present-day issues. P. Whitney Lackenbauer focused on the Canadian Rangers as a successful model of Indigenous-Crown partnership, emphasizing their role in providing a military presence in remote areas. He suggested that official statistics under-represent Indigenous participation in the Rangers. Peter Kikkert spoke about the Rangers' critical role in emergency response in northern communities and recommended making it easier to use the Rangers, providing them with necessary tools and training, and supporting their well-being. Committee members discussed ways to improve recruitment and retention, address systemic issues, and better recognize the contributions of Indigenous members. They also explored the potential for expanding the Canadian Rangers program and leveraging Indigenous languages and knowledge in military operations. The committee acknowledged the need for further analysis and action to create a more inclusive and supportive environment within the CAF.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss the situation of Francophone and Indigenous members in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF). Committee members heard from Lieutenant-General Erick Simoneau, Major-General Martin Gros-Jean, and Anne Rahming, who are responsible for personnel management and official languages within the Department of National Defence and the CAF. They talked about the importance of diversity and inclusion in the military. Lieutenant-General Simoneau stated that 24% of the CAF is Francophone, which is higher than the national average. He said that Francophones often learn a second language early in their careers, while Anglophones tend to learn later. He also noted that Indigenous representation in the CAF is at 2.8%, and efforts are being made to increase this number. Major-General Gros-Jean emphasized the importance of bilingualism for operational effectiveness, especially in international deployments. Anne Rahming discussed the implementation of the modernized Official Languages Act and efforts to promote bilingualism within the CAF. Committee members asked about language training, recruitment challenges, and retention strategies. Concerns were raised about recruits who do not speak either official language fluently and the need for better language testing. The witnesses explained that language training is provided, and efforts are being made to ensure that all members can function in at least one official language. They also discussed initiatives to recruit and retain Indigenous members, such as the Indigenous Leadership Opportunity Year and summer camps. The committee acknowledged the importance of addressing systemic issues and promoting a culture of inclusivity within the CAF. The committee discussed the Canadian Rangers and the need to expand their capabilities, particularly in the Arctic. Members also raised concerns about security screening for new recruits, especially those from immigrant backgrounds. The witnesses assured the committee that thorough security checks are conducted to ensure that all members meet the required standards. The committee requested additional data on language proficiency and representation within the CAF. No specific decisions were made during the meeting, but the committee members emphasized the importance of ongoing efforts to promote diversity, inclusion, and bilingualism within the Canadian Armed Forces. They also highlighted the need for better language training, recruitment strategies, and retention programs to ensure that the CAF reflects the diversity of Canadian society.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss supplementary budget estimates for the Department of National Defence, the Canadian Armed Forces, the Canadian Coast Guard, and the Communications Security Establishment Canada. Minister of National Defence David McGuinty highlighted the need for increased defense spending to reach 2% of GDP, citing global instability and evolving threats. Key areas of focus included investments in military equipment, support for Canadian Armed Forces personnel, and expansion of the Canadian Coast Guard's security role. The committee also discussed investments in northern operations and partnerships with Indigenous communities. During the meeting, committee members questioned Minister McGuinty on various topics, including comments he made about a U.S. official and the government's response to attacks on Canadian forces in the Middle East. Conservative MP James Bezan pressed the Minister on whether he regretted calling the U.S. official's decision "principled" after learning about the official's anti-Semitic views. Bezan also questioned why the government didn't immediately inform Canadians about missile and drone attacks on Camp Canada in Kuwait. Minister McGuinty defended the government's approach, citing security concerns and coordination with allies. The committee also discussed the Canadian Rangers, the remotely piloted aircraft system, and support for Ukraine. Members inquired about plans to retire certain military fleets, investments in Arctic infrastructure, and the status of the remotely piloted aircraft system project. The Minister and other officials provided updates on these initiatives and addressed concerns about potential delays and the involvement of Canadian companies. Ultimately, the committee agreed to ban remote interpretation for future meetings and adopted a proposed budget of $500 for the study of the supplementary estimates. They also scheduled future meetings to discuss topics such as francophone and indigenous CAF members, DND and CAF contaminated sites, and a visit from the European Parliament security and defence committee.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss the connection between national defence, national security, and Canada's critical minerals sector. Witnesses Wendy Hadwen from the Department of National Defence and Isabella Chan from the Department of Natural Resources explained how Canada's critical mineral resources are important for economic and defence advantages. They highlighted the Defence Industrial Strategy, which aims to secure domestic supply chains for key materials like steel, aluminum, and critical minerals. The proposed law would allow the defence investment agency to negotiate stockpiling agreements and long-term purchases. Hadwen emphasized that Canada's defence sector significantly contributes to the economy through research and development. She also mentioned Canada's role in a NATO project to stockpile critical minerals like lithium and titanium, reducing reliance on external suppliers. Chan noted that critical minerals are now a global priority due to supply chain issues and increased defence spending. She pointed out that Canada has the potential to produce all 12 critical minerals identified by NATO and is taking steps to strengthen its supply chain through the Canadian Critical Minerals Strategy. During the meeting, committee members questioned the witnesses about using natural resources for leverage in negotiations and restoring investor confidence in Canada's mining sector. They also discussed the importance of domestic supply chains, reprocessing waste, and the need for regulatory certainty to attract investment. The committee explored the possibility of disruptions in supply chains and which minerals would be most at risk. The witnesses were also asked about the progress of creating critical mineral strategic reserves and whether Canada has sufficient stockpiles for military efforts. Later in the meeting, Cristina Pekarik, an economics and resource policy expert, testified about the fiscal aspects of critical and strategic minerals. She argued that critical minerals revenue could help finance Canada's defence commitments. Pekarik suggested modeling a pipeline of critical mineral projects to generate revenue for defence spending and highlighted the need to expedite project timelines. She also raised concerns about foreign ownership gaps and the lack of strategic mineral stockpiles in Canada. Pekarik recommended modernizing the critical minerals strategy, integrating defence fiscal capacity, and closing security gaps. The committee discussed various aspects of critical minerals, including the challenges of developing projects in the north, the competitiveness of Canadian production, and the importance of Indigenous partnerships. They also explored the need for greater control over the critical minerals value chain and the role of the Defence Production Act. The meeting concluded with a discussion on strategic stockpiles and the importance of knowing how much of each critical mineral Canada has and how those levels are determined.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss the connection between national defence, national security, and critical minerals. The committee members heard from several witnesses from the mining industry, research institutions, and advocacy groups. The discussion covered topics such as securing critical mineral supply chains, increasing domestic processing capacity, and the role of research and development in strengthening Canada's defence capabilities. Nadia Mykytczuk from Laurentian University emphasized that Canada's defence security depends on its mineral security. She suggested focusing on processing capacity and using mine waste as a strategic mineral reserve. Rodrigue Turgeon from MiningWatch Canada stressed the importance of environmental protection and Indigenous rights when developing mineral resources. He cautioned against prioritizing economic gains at the expense of human rights and environmental sustainability. Heather Exner-Pirot from the Macdonald-Laurier Institute highlighted the need to define critical minerals carefully and focus on those intentionally monopolized by China. Jim Balsillie from the Centre for International Governance Innovation argued that Canada's policy thinking is outdated and that the country needs to focus on owning intellectual property and data related to critical minerals. Sean Boyd from Agnico Eagle Mines Limited emphasized the importance of socio-economic benefits and community support in the Arctic, suggesting that strong communities contribute to strong sovereignty. The committee discussed potential next steps, including improving regulatory certainty for mining projects, investing in skills training and development, and fostering collaboration between government, industry, and research institutions. There was also discussion of how Canada can work with allies, such as Australia, to secure reliable supplies of strategic minerals and diversify supply chains.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss the connection between national defence, national security, and critical minerals. Witnesses from mining and business organizations spoke about Canada's potential to be a reliable supplier of critical minerals to allies, especially NATO, and how this relates to Arctic sovereignty and defence readiness. They emphasized the importance of secure supply chains and the need for Canada to increase its mineral extraction and processing capabilities. Speakers included Hudson Lester from the NWT and Nunavut Chamber of Mines, Photinie Koutsavlis from the Mining Association of Canada, Michael Gullo from the Business Council of Canada, and Jeff Gaulin from Vale Base Metals. The witnesses highlighted challenges such as lengthy project approval times, competition from countries with lower standards (like China), and the need for more investment in mining and refining infrastructure. They suggested solutions like streamlining regulations, offering tax incentives to encourage mining development, and creating a critical mineral reserve for defence purposes. The witnesses also discussed the importance of international cooperation and partnerships with allies to secure supply chains. Committee members debated the role of carbon pricing and environmental regulations in the mining sector's competitiveness. They also discussed the potential for stockpiling critical minerals and the need to balance economic development with responsible environmental practices and indigenous community engagement. The committee agreed to invite the Parliamentary Budget Officer to discuss reports on defence spending and the National Defence and Canadian Armed Forces Ombudsman to discuss a report on the Primary Reserve. They also agreed to invite the Minister of National Defence to discuss the Defence Industrial Strategy and to undertake a study of the Defence Industrial Strategy.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss the connection between national defence, national security, and critical minerals. The committee wanted to understand how securing access to these minerals impacts Canada's safety and economic well-being. Witnesses shared their expertise on international law, defence strategy, and mineral regulations. They talked about the importance of securing Canada's own supply of critical minerals, especially rare earth elements, and the risks of foreign control, particularly from China and the United States.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss and amend a proposed law to update the National Defence Act. The committee worked through the proposed law clause by clause, considering and voting on several amendments. Witnesses Colonel Geneviève Lortie and Lieutenant-Colonel Matt MacMillan from the Canadian Armed Forces provided expert advice on the legal and practical implications of the proposed changes. Key discussions included ensuring victims' rights, providing support for accused individuals, and maintaining the independence of military judges. James Bezan (Conservative) introduced several amendments focused on these areas. Some amendments, like those ensuring victims can request a different liaison officer and extending certain rights to the accused, were supported across party lines. Other amendments sparked debate, particularly those concerning the role of the Minister of National Defence versus the Judge Advocate General in issuing guidelines and the provision of legal counsel to military members charged in civilian courts. Several amendments proposed by Mr. Bezan sought to set timelines for filling key military justice positions, aiming to address delays in appointments. The committee often debated whether changes should be implemented through legislation or policy, with some members arguing that policy allows for more flexibility and regular updates. Ultimately, the committee agreed to amend the proposed law, and decided to report the updated version back to the House of Commons. The committee agreed to reconsider one amendment to ensure consistency throughout the proposed law. They also decided to order a reprint of the proposed law as amended, for use by the House at the report stage. The committee will meet again on Monday to discuss further business.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss proposed changes to the National Defence Act. The main focus was on a proposed law, Bill C-11, that would change how the military handles sexual misconduct cases. Committee members debated amendments (suggested changes) to the proposed law, including who should investigate these cases and whether victims should have a choice in the matter. Key speakers included Tim Watchorn and Viviane Lapointe, who argued for giving civilian courts exclusive jurisdiction over sexual offences to provide clarity and protect survivors. James Bezan advocated for maintaining choice for victims and allowing the military to investigate certain cases. Colonel Geneviève Lortie, a witness from the Canadian Armed Forces, provided legal expertise and raised concerns about potential confusion and delays if the proposed changes created overlapping jurisdictions between military and civilian systems. The committee voted on several amendments. One amendment, CPC-3, was approved. Another amendment, CPC-5, was also approved after a subamendment (a change to the change) was added. The committee also voted to create a plan for an office of the inspector general for sexual misconduct in the Canadian Forces. Finally, they agreed to a sunset clause, meaning the changes would only last for a set time (four years) before being reviewed. The committee agreed to adjourn and continue their review of the proposed law at the next meeting.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss proposed changes to the National Defence Act. These changes, outlined in a proposed law, aim to update military justice processes. The committee reviewed the proposed law clause by clause, considering amendments. Witnesses included Colonel Geneviève Lortie and Lieutenant-Colonel Matt MacMillan, who provided expert advice on the legal and practical implications of the proposed changes. Committee members debated the merits of different amendments, particularly those related to victim choice in the justice system and timelines for filling key positions. One key debate focused on an amendment that would allow victims of military sexual trauma to choose whether their cases are heard in the military or civilian justice system. Some committee members argued that this choice is essential for empowering victims and ensuring justice. Others raised concerns that giving victims this choice could create legal and practical challenges, potentially retraumatizing victims if their choice doesn't lead to a successful prosecution. Colonel Lortie explained that the proposed amendment could conflict with the principle of prosecutorial discretion, which gives prosecutors the final say on where a case is heard. Another point of contention was an amendment proposing a 90-day time limit for filling the position of Judge Advocate General (JAG). Supporters argued this would ensure timely leadership in military justice. Colonel Lortie cautioned that imposing such a strict timeline on the Governor in Council (GIC), who makes the appointment, could be unenforceable and create legal uncertainties. Despite these concerns, the committee voted to approve an amended version of this proposal, extending the timeline to 120 days. Ultimately, the committee did not complete its review of the proposed law. Due to time constraints and ongoing debate, a motion was made to postpone further consideration of certain clauses and amendments. The committee agreed to resume its discussion at a future meeting. The goal is to balance the need for a fair and efficient military justice system with the rights and needs of victims.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss modernizing North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and strengthening Canada's Arctic defenses. Key witnesses included Lieutenant-General Jamie Speiser-Blanchet, commander of the Royal Canadian Air Force, and Jonathan Quinn, director general for continental defence policy at the Department of National Defence. Quinn emphasized the increasing dangers in the world and the need to enhance Canada's defense capabilities, especially in the Arctic. He highlighted investments in new sensors, command and control systems, and infrastructure to counter threats like advanced cruise missiles and hypersonic weapons. Lieutenant-General Speiser-Blanchet addressed concerns about maintaining sovereign control of Canadian airspace, stating that the F-35 fighter jet is crucial for defending against advanced threats from Russia and China. She also discussed ongoing efforts to enhance security at Canadian air force bases to support the F-35s and other new aircraft. Committee members raised questions about the timeline for infrastructure upgrades, the location of radar installations, and the integration of the Canadian Coast Guard into defense operations. The committee also discussed the potential for industrial benefits for Quebec-based companies in the defense sector, particularly in areas like hypersonics. Witnesses confirmed that Canada is not focused on a military threat from the southern border with the United States, but rather on continued collaboration with U.S. allies for the defense of the shared continent. The committee agreed that the Coast Guard needs updated regulations to share security information with allies. Members also discussed the importance of learning from global conflicts like the war in Ukraine, particularly regarding the proliferation of drones and the need for rapid modernization. The committee heard that the Coast Guard is working to increase sensor capabilities on ships and is sharing expertise in ice navigation with the Royal Canadian Navy. The committee also discussed the importance of Greenland to North American defense. Overall, the meeting focused on the need for Canada to invest in modernizing its defense capabilities, particularly in the Arctic, to address evolving threats and maintain a strong partnership with the United States and other allies. The committee emphasized the importance of integrating new technologies and strengthening infrastructure to ensure Canada's ability to defend its airspace and maritime approaches.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss proposed changes to the military justice system and the integration of the Canadian Coast Guard into the Department of National Defence. The committee heard from the Minister of Justice, Sean Fraser, about proposed law C-11, which aims to move complaints of sexual offences outside the military justice system's jurisdiction. Minister Fraser argued this change would create a safer environment for victims to come forward, while some committee members expressed concerns about victims losing the choice to use the military system. Witnesses from the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Coast Guard then discussed the integration of the Coast Guard into the Department of National Defence. Minister Fraser explained that the proposed law aims to address delays in the criminal justice system and ensure perpetrators are brought to justice. He highlighted the importance of listening to victims and experts, but defended the government's decision to prioritize the recommendations of Justice Arbour, who suggested moving sexual offence complaints to the civilian system. Some committee members questioned why the government was not giving victims a choice between the military and civilian systems, as recommended by other experts and witnesses. During the discussion on the Coast Guard integration, Natasha Kim, Associate Deputy Minister, Department of National Defence, provided an update on the transition process, emphasizing a "people-first" approach and the preservation of the Coast Guard's unique identity. Mario Pelletier, Commissioner of the Canadian Coast Guard, discussed the Coast Guard's strategic role in the Arctic and its capabilities for environmental protection. Committee members raised concerns about the Coast Guard's new security mandate and whether it would be adequately equipped to handle potential threats. Members questioned the value of the Coast Guard's new security role if they would leave at the sign of a threat. Commissioner Pelletier clarified that the Coast Guard would assess threats and take appropriate action, but would not engage in armed combat. The committee discussed the potential for the Coast Guard to become a military target and the need for adequate resources and training to support its expanded mandate. Ultimately, a motion was put forward to compel the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Coast Guard to provide all analyses and documents that informed the decision to integrate the Coast Guard into the Department of National Defence. The meeting adjourned with ongoing questions about the rationale and potential impacts of the Coast Guard integration and the proposed changes to the military justice system.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine. The Ambassador of Ukraine to Canada, Andrii Plakhotniuk, spoke about the urgent need for continued support from Canada, including financial aid, military equipment, and training. He emphasized the importance of air defense systems and ammunition to protect Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure from Russian attacks. He also highlighted the need to ramp up joint production of weapons and equipment with Canada and other partners. Ambassador Plakhotniuk thanked Canada for its previous contributions, such as Operation Unifier, which has trained over 46,000 Ukrainian military personnel. He also discussed the devastating impact of the war on Ukraine's energy sector, with over 50% of its capacity destroyed or damaged. He mentioned the abduction of Ukrainian children and the destruction of civilian infrastructure as examples of war crimes committed by Russia. Committee members asked how Canada can best assist Ukraine, particularly in areas like air defense, critical minerals, and cyber security. Several committee members expressed their strong support for Ukraine and condemned Russia's aggression. They discussed ways to deepen cooperation between Canada and Ukraine, including joint production of drones and other military technologies. The ambassador emphasized that Ukraine is not willing to give up any territory in peace negotiations and that a just and sustainable peace must include security guarantees to prevent future aggression. He also addressed concerns about corruption in Ukraine, stating that the government is committed to addressing these issues and maintaining international credibility. Committee members discussed the importance of countering misinformation campaigns and maintaining unity in support of Ukraine. The ambassador highlighted the resilience and determination of the Ukrainian people in the face of adversity. He stressed that the war in Ukraine is not only a fight for Ukraine's survival but also a fight for democracy and freedom around the world. Committee members agreed on the importance of continued support for Ukraine and expressed their solidarity with the Ukrainian people. No specific decisions were made during the meeting, but the committee members indicated they would continue to explore ways to support Ukraine and hold Russia accountable for its actions. The committee will likely continue to monitor the situation in Ukraine and discuss further measures to assist the country in its fight for survival.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence met to discuss supplementary budget estimates for the Department of National Defence, the Communications Security Establishment (CSE), and the Canadian Coast Guard. Minister of National Defence David McGuinty highlighted the government's commitment to rebuilding and rearming the military, noting a $1.1 billion funding request for National Defence. Discussions covered investments in fighter jets, naval destroyers, ammunition production, and NORAD modernization. Committee members questioned the Minister on topics such as the selection process for new fighter jets, military housing shortages, and the integration of the Coast Guard into the Department of National Defence. Conservative members, led by James Bezan, pressed the Minister on the ongoing review of the F-35 fighter jet procurement, questioning whether the government was aware of the F-35's strong performance in the original competition. They also raised concerns about potential delays and cost increases associated with alternative aircraft. Liberal members, including Viviane Lapointe, focused on how the budget would improve the quality of life for Canadian Armed Forces members through better housing and modernized workplaces. They also inquired about investments in Arctic defense and NORAD modernization. Members also discussed a motion regarding Bill C-11, related to sexual misconduct in the Canadian Armed Forces. The committee agreed to postpone clause-by-clause consideration of the proposed law until Parliament returns in January 2026, allowing more time to review and propose amendments. The committee also requested the Department of National Defence to provide a Memorandum of Understanding with the Province of Ontario concerning the implementation of the provisions contained in Bill C-11.