Recent Votes

This proposed law, Bill C-11, makes changes to the rules for the military, and this vote is about changing part of it.

165 Yea

171 Nay

This vote is about a small change to a proposed law called Bill C-11. Bill C-11 is about updating the rules for military justice in Canada. The change being voted on deals with Clause 18 of the proposed law. Clause 18 likely covers a specific part of the military justice system. This vote is to change the wording of that specific part. If this change passes, it will slightly alter how the military justice system works. Citizens should care because it affects how fairly military members are treated if they break the rules. It also affects how well the military can do its job.

This vote was about removing a section from a proposed law that changes the rules for the military.

178 Nay

This vote is about a proposed change to Bill C-11, a law that would update the rules for military justice. The change being voted on would remove a specific part (Clause 8) of the proposed law. We don't know exactly what Clause 8 does, but it's something lawmakers disagree about. If they vote to remove Clause 8, that part will not become law. If they vote against removing Clause 8, it will stay in the proposed law. Citizens should care because this law affects how the military handles legal issues. It could change how soldiers are treated if they break the rules. It also affects how the military keeps order and handles problems within its ranks.

This vote was about removing a section from a proposed law that changes the rules for the military.

178 Nay

This vote is about a proposed change to Bill C-11, a law that would update the rules for military justice. Someone wants to remove a specific part of the law, called Clause 7. Think of Clause 7 as one piece of the puzzle that makes up the whole military justice system. By voting to remove it, the person believes that part of the puzzle doesn't fit or isn't needed. If Clause 7 is removed, the military justice system will be different than what was originally planned in Bill C-11. This could affect how the military handles things like investigations, trials, and punishments. Citizens should care because it impacts how fairly and effectively the military justice system works for those who serve our country.

Vote to change Bill C-11Passed

This is a change to Bill C-11 that would affect the rules for the military.

171 Yea

165 Nay

This vote is about a small change to a proposed law called Bill C-11. This law wants to update the rules for military justice. The change being voted on deals with Clause 7 of the proposed law. We don't know exactly what Clause 7 says, but the vote is about changing the wording of that specific part. If this change passes, then Clause 7 will be altered in the final version of Bill C-11. Citizens should care because this law affects how the military handles legal issues. It could change how soldiers are treated if they break the rules. This vote is one small step in deciding what the final law will look like.

Vote on Bill C-11 — accept committee changes?Passed

Bill C-11 would change the rules for the military and other laws, with some updates.

200 Yea

136 Nay

This vote is about making changes to the rules for how the military handles legal issues. It's connected to Bill C-11. Right now, the proposed law is being looked at closely by Members of Parliament. They've already made some changes to it. This vote is to agree with the changes that have been made so far and to possibly add even more changes. If this vote passes, it means the proposed law, with all its changes, can move forward. It will then be debated again and voted on. These changes could affect how the military deals with things like discipline and misconduct. It's important because it could change the way justice works for people in the military.

Vote to change Bill C-11Passed

Bill C-11: This proposed law would change the rules for the military, and this vote was about removing some lines from page 8.

171 Yea

165 Nay

This vote is about a small change to a proposed law called Bill C-11. This law wants to update the rules for the military justice system. The change being voted on would remove some lines from the proposed law. These lines are about who can be a judge in the military. Right now, the law says who is allowed to be a judge. This vote would take away some of that specific wording. If these lines are removed, it could change who is eligible to be a military judge. This might affect how fair and effective the military justice system is. People should care because it deals with how the military handles legal issues and ensures fairness for those serving in the armed forces.

Bill C-11: This change would remove the short title (nickname) of the proposed law.

178 Nay

This vote is about a small but symbolic change to Bill C-11. Bill C-11 is a proposed law that would update the rules for military justice. The people in Parliament are being asked to vote on whether to remove the short title of the proposed law. The "short title" is the nickname the law is given. Removing it doesn't change the actual content of the law. Citizens should care because even small changes can sometimes be important. This vote is a chance for Members of Parliament to show what they think about this proposed law.

Vote to change Bill C-11Passed

This is a change to Bill C-11 that would rewrite part of the proposed law about the military, from page 5 to page 7.

178 Yea

158 Nay

This vote is about a proposed change to Bill C-11. Bill C-11 is a proposed law that would update the rules for military justice. This specific vote is about changing a section of the proposed law that deals with military police. The change would replace several pages of the proposed law with new text. It seems like lawmakers want to rewrite part of the proposed law to change how military police operate. If this change passes, it will directly affect how the military justice system works, especially concerning the military police. Citizens should care because it impacts how fairly people in the military are treated when accused of breaking the law. It also affects the public's trust in the military justice system.

Opposition challengeDefeated

4 May 2026

The House asks the government to stop its plan to create a $25 billion fund using borrowed money, because it will cause inflation and benefit political insiders instead of helping regular Canadians.

160 Yea

175 Nay

This vote is about whether the government should create a $25 billion fund using borrowed money. The money would be used to invest in different projects. Those who oppose the fund say the government doesn't have extra money to invest because it has been borrowing money for years. They also worry that the government will use the fund to help its friends instead of investing in good projects. They suggest that instead of creating this fund, the government should focus on making it easier for pension funds to invest in Canada. If the House votes in favour of this motion, it's a message to the government to stop planning this investment fund. This could mean less government involvement in directing where money goes in the economy. Citizens should care because it affects how their tax dollars are spent and who benefits from government investments.

PPPierre PoilievreConservative

Vote to limit debate on Bill C-11Passed

4 May 2026

Bill C-11: This vote is about limiting how long the House of Commons can talk about changes to the laws for National Defence.

169 Yea

164 Nay

This vote is about how much time the House of Commons will spend discussing Bill C-11. Bill C-11 is a proposed law that would change the rules for military justice. The government wants to limit the debate on this proposed law. If this motion passes, there will be only one more day to talk about changes to the proposed law and one more day to decide if it should pass. After that, the House will vote, no matter what. This means some members of Parliament might not get a chance to share their ideas or concerns about the proposed changes to military law. Citizens should care because this vote decides how carefully the government considers changes to the military justice system.

Vote on Bill C-220PassedPassed Without Counting

4 May 2026

Bill C-220 would tell judges to think about a person's immigration status when deciding their punishment for a crime.

This vote was about a proposed law called Bill C-220. The law would have changed how judges decide sentences for people who have committed crimes. Right now, judges look at many things when deciding a sentence. This proposed law would have added another thing for them to think about: the person's immigration status in Canada. For example, are they a permanent resident, a refugee, or in Canada without permission? The judge would have to consider how a sentence might affect that person's ability to stay in Canada. This proposed law was defeated, meaning it did not pass. So, judges will not be required to consider a person's immigration status when deciding on a sentence. People might care about this because it deals with fairness in the justice system and how we treat immigrants and refugees who break the law.

C-220Law Would Consider Immigration Status During Sentencing

JSJamie SchmaleConservative

Vote on Bill C-30PassedEveryone Agreed

1 May 2026

Bill C-30 is a proposed law to make the government's spring budget plans happen.

This vote is about a small thing that helps the House of Commons run smoothly. The member wants to share their speaking time with someone else. They need everyone to agree, which is called unanimous consent. If everyone says yes, they can split their time. If even one person says no, they can't. This kind of vote happens often and helps speed things up. This vote is connected to Bill C-30. That proposed law would change some tax rules. For example, people might be able to deduct some work expenses. It also changes rules for businesses. Citizens should care because these tax changes could affect how much money they have.

C-30Law to Put Spring Economic Plan Into Action

YPYves PerronBloc Québécois

Committees of the HousePassedSaid Yes or No

30 Apr 2026

The committee made a report about creating a group to review military awards.

This vote is about a report from a group of Members of Parliament who studied military awards. They looked into whether Canada should create a new, independent group to review military honours. Right now, the military decides who gets awards. Some people think an outside group should make those decisions instead. This committee looked at that idea and wrote a report about it. This vote is about accepting that report. If the House of Commons accepts the report, it means they agree with what the committee found. This could lead to changes in how military honours are decided in the future. If you care about how our veterans are recognized, you should care about this vote.

BRBlake RichardsConservative

Ways and means motion No. 10Passed

29 Apr 2026

This vote is about agreeing with a plan to create a proposed law that puts parts of the spring economic update into action.

173 Yea

161 Nay

This vote is about starting a new proposed law based on the government's economic plans. The government presented its ideas for the economy in a document called the "spring economic update." This vote is to agree with the government's plan to turn some of those ideas into a real proposed law. If the vote passes, the government can then introduce a detailed proposed law in Parliament. This matters because the proposed law could change taxes, benefits, or other things that affect your money and the economy. It's the first step in making those changes happen. Citizens should care because it could impact their jobs, income, and the cost of living.

FCFrançois-Philippe ChampagneLiberal

Procedural voteDefeated

27 Apr 2026

This vote is about changing the rules for how committees are formed in Parliament, specifically the Public Accounts committee will have 9 members: 4 Liberals, 4 Conservatives, and 1 from the Bloc Québ…

JBJohn BrassardConservative

172 Nay

This vote is about how Parliament works. Specifically, it's about changing the rules for how committees are formed. Committees are small groups of Members of Parliament who study specific topics in detail. This vote suggests changing the size and makeup of one particular committee: the Public Accounts committee. The proposal is to have 9 members on the committee, with 4 Liberals, 4 Conservatives, and 1 from the Bloc Québécois. Why should you care? Committees do important work reviewing government spending and holding the government accountable. The number of members from each party on a committee can affect how well it does its job. This change could affect how closely the government's spending is examined.

Procedural votePassed

27 Apr 2026

This changes the rules about how many members are on certain House of Commons committees and who they are.

178 Yea

162 Nay

This vote is about changing the rules for how many members are on certain committees in Parliament. Committees are small groups of politicians who study specific topics and make recommendations. The motion wants to increase the number of members on most committees from 10 to 12. It also changes how many members each political party gets on these committees. For example, the Liberal party would get more seats on some committees. Some special committees like the ones dealing with privacy, government spending, and women's issues would stay smaller, with 10 members. This change matters because it affects the balance of power on committees. More members from the governing party could make it easier for them to control what the committee studies and what recommendations it makes. Citizens should care because committee work influences the laws and policies that affect their lives.

Motion for closurePassed

27 Apr 2026

Stop the discussion from being put off to another day.

173 Yea

163 Nay

This vote is about speeding up a debate in Parliament. The government wants to stop the current discussion on "Government Business No. 9." They are using a special rule to force a vote on it soon. This means Members of Parliament will have less time to speak and share their views. If the government wins this vote, the debate will end quickly. Then, whatever "Government Business No. 9" is about will move closer to becoming law, or being rejected. Citizens should care because this affects how carefully new laws are considered. Less debate could mean important issues are missed.

Vote on Bill C-25PassedPassed Without Counting

24 Apr 2026

Bill C-25 is now approved.

This vote is about a proposed law called Bill C-25. This law wants to make changes to how Canadian elections work. It also wants to rename some areas where people vote. Think of it like this: imagine your school is changing the rules for student council elections. Maybe they're making it easier for students to vote, or changing the names of the classrooms used for voting. That's what this law is trying to do for Canada's elections. Why should you care? Because these changes could affect how easy it is for people to vote and who gets elected. If it's easier for everyone to vote, then the people we elect will better represent what all Canadians want. This vote is a step in making those changes happen.

C-25Law proposes changes to election rules and riding names.

EMElizabeth MayGreen Party

Vote on Bill C-226 — approve in principlePassed

Bill C-226 would create a plan to make food prices easier to understand.

C-226New Law Proposed to Show How Food Prices Are Set

150 Nay

This vote is about a proposed law called Bill C-226. It's about making food prices easier to understand. Right now, it can be hard to know why the price of groceries goes up or down. If this proposed law passes, the government would create a system to track food prices. This system would look at each step in the food process, from the farm to the store. It would help explain how much things cost along the way. This matters because everyone needs to buy food. When prices are clear, people can make better choices about what to buy. It could also help make sure companies aren't unfairly raising prices. If the vote passes, Bill C-226 will go to a committee for closer study.

GSGurbux SainiLiberal

Vote on Bill S-211 — approve in principlePassed

S-211Law to Control Sports Betting Ads Across Canada

Bill S-211 is being discussed to create a plan for how sports betting is advertised in Canada.

291 Yea

This vote is about a proposed law called Bill S-211. It deals with how sports betting is advertised in Canada. Right now, there aren't specific rules about these ads across the whole country. The proposed law wants the government to come up with a plan, or "framework," for these ads. This plan would focus on protecting young people and those who struggle with gambling addiction. The idea is to make sure these ads aren't harmful or misleading to vulnerable people. If Members of Parliament vote yes, the proposed law will go to a committee. The committee will study it more closely and might make changes. Citizens should care because this law could change how they see sports betting advertised, especially if they have kids or are concerned about gambling problems.

BCBardish ChaggerLiberal

Vote on Bill C-21PassedPassed Without Counting

C-21Law Formally Recognizes Red River Métis Self-Government

This is about how lawmakers in the room can say they want to vote on proposed law C-21.

This vote is about a step in the process of making Bill C-21 into a law. Bill C-21 is about a special agreement with the Red River Métis people, recognizing their right to make their own decisions about their community. The House of Commons is discussing the bill and making changes to it. This vote is about how they will record who supports the bill. If a member of parliament wants to show their support, or if a political party wants a formal count of the votes, they can ask for it. This matters because it's a key step in recognizing the Red River Métis' right to self-government. Citizens should care because it affects how the government works with Indigenous people and how treaties are put into action.

ZAZiad AboultaifConservative

Vote on Bill C-238 — approve in principlePassed

Bill C-238 is a proposed law to change the rules about court orders that make criminals pay back victims.

C-238Law proposed to make criminals pay back victims

153 Nay

This vote is about a proposed law called Bill C-238. It deals with restitution, which is when a court orders a criminal to pay money to the victim to cover their losses. Right now, it can be hard for victims to get the money they are owed. This proposed law wants to make the process easier. It would change the rules in the Criminal Code to help victims get the money they are entitled to from criminals who harmed them. If this vote passes, Bill C-238 will go to the Justice Committee for a closer look. This is an important step in making sure victims of crime get the financial help they deserve. Citizens should care because it affects how our justice system treats victims and holds criminals accountable.

VLViviane LapointeLiberal

Private Members' Business M-16 (Use of underused and surplus federal lands and buildings for services for veterans)Passed

M-16 asks a committee to study using empty government land and buildings to help veterans and their communities.

Appointment of an officer of ParliamentPassed

151 Nay

This vote is about helping veterans by looking at how the government uses its empty or underused buildings and land. The person who proposed this idea wants the government to study if these properties could be turned into places that offer services for veterans. These places could help veterans get the support they need after serving in the military. The vote asks the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates to do this study. If the vote passes, the committee will spend six months looking into this idea. They will then write a report with their findings. This could lead to new programs or services for veterans in communities across Canada. Citizens should care because it could improve the lives of veterans and make sure they are taken care of after their service.

AHAlana HirtleLiberal

The House voted to approve Annette Ryan as the Parliamentary Budget Officer for seven years.

164 Yea

153 Nay

This vote is about choosing someone for a very important job: the Parliamentary Budget Officer. The Parliamentary Budget Officer helps Members of Parliament understand how the government spends money. They look at the government's plans and check if the numbers add up. They also give advice about the budget. If we have a good Parliamentary Budget Officer, our elected officials can make better decisions about how to spend our tax dollars. This vote is to approve Annette Ryan for the job for the next seven years. Citizens should care because this person will have a big influence on government spending.

Committees of the HousePassedPassed Without Counting

HKHelena KonanzConservative

We must now vote on the current motion before the House.

This vote is about moving forward with a decision in the House of Commons. Basically, the Speaker is saying it's time to stop talking and vote on whatever topic was being discussed. If any Member of Parliament wants to make a formal, recorded vote, now is their chance to ask for it. Otherwise, they'll just do a quick voice vote. Citizens should care because this is how laws are made. This vote determines if the House moves on to a new topic or makes a decision on the current one.

Appointment of Parliamentary Budget OfficerPassedPassed Without Counting

MPs are voting on who should be the person in charge of watching the government's spending.

This vote is about choosing someone to be the Parliamentary Budget Officer. This person is like a financial watchdog for the government. The Budget Officer gives independent advice to Members of Parliament about the government's spending plans. They check if the government's numbers add up and tell MPs if the government is being honest about how much things will cost. It's important to have a good Budget Officer because they help make sure the government is spending our money wisely. Citizens should care because this person can help keep the government accountable for how they use taxpayer dollars.

Seventh report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with DisabilitiesDefeated

GGGarnett GenuisConservative

Let's agree with the recommendations in a report about people with disabilities.

152 Yea

166 Nay

This vote is about a report from a group of Members of Parliament who studied issues around people, jobs, and skills. This committee, called the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, looked at something and wrote a report about it. The vote is on whether the House of Commons agrees with the report. If the House agrees, it means they support the ideas and suggestions in the report. The committee likely made recommendations about what the government should do to help people find jobs, get training, or support those with disabilities. Based on the meeting dates, it is likely that the report is about youth employment in Canada, as that was the subject of a meeting shortly before the report was presented. It could also be related to Bill C-20, though meetings about that proposed law happened after the report was presented. If the House agrees with the report, the government might take action on those recommendations, which could affect young people looking for work.

Vote on Bill C-231 — approve in principlePassed

15 Apr 2026

Bill C-231: Let's read this proposed law about changing the rules for young people in the justice system and send it to a committee to study.

327 Yea

This vote is about a proposed law called Bill C-231. It wants to make changes to how young people who commit crimes are treated in the justice system. Right now, there's a special law called the Youth Criminal Justice Act that deals with young offenders. If Members of Parliament vote yes, it means they want to keep discussing and changing Bill C-231. The proposed law will then go to a special group of MPs called a committee. This committee will look closely at the proposed law and suggest improvements. Citizens should care because this proposed law could change how young people are punished for crimes. It could affect safety in communities and the lives of young people who get into trouble with the law.

C-231Law Would Change How Young Offenders Are Handled

LBLuc BertholdConservative

Opposition challengeDefeated

15 Apr 2026

The opposition wants the government to cut fuel taxes to save Canadians 25 cents per litre until the end of 2026.

134 Yea

192 Nay

This vote is about whether the government should cut taxes on gas and diesel. The opposition party wants to get rid of some federal taxes to make gas cheaper for everyone. They say this would save Canadians 25 cents per liter until the end of 2026. Right now, Canadians pay more for gas than Americans because of these taxes. The opposition believes that getting rid of these taxes will help people save money when they fill up their cars. They also argue that some of these taxes, like the carbon tax, could hurt the economy and cause job losses. This is important for you because it affects how much you pay for gas. If the vote passes, gas prices could go down. If it fails, prices will likely stay the same. This could impact your budget, especially if you drive a lot.

JHJasraj HallanConservative

Private Members' Business M-15 (Conservation donations)Passed

15 Apr 2026

This motion asks the government to consider changing tax rules to encourage people to donate money or land for conservation.

193 Yea

132 Nay

This vote is about encouraging people to donate land or money to help protect nature. Canada wants to protect 30% of its land by 2030 to help plants and animals. In some areas, like the Eastern Townships, most of the land is owned by regular people, not the government. So, getting people to voluntarily protect their land is important. One way to do this is through something called the Ecological Gifts Program, which gives tax breaks to people who donate land for conservation. However, groups that protect this land also need money to operate. This motion suggests that the government should give bigger tax breaks for money donations to these groups. The idea is to make it fair for all donors, whether they donate land or money, and to encourage more people to donate, so Canada can reach its goal of protecting more nature. This vote is connected to the Income Tax Act.

LVLouis VilleneuveLiberal

Vote on Bill C-225PassedPassed Without Counting

13 Apr 2026

This proposed law is moving forward after a voice vote.

This vote is about a proposed law called Bill C-225 that would change the Criminal Code. The members of parliament have already studied the proposed law and are now voting on it. "Carried" means the members of parliament agree to move forward with the proposed law. A "voice vote" means they simply say "yes" or "no" as a group, instead of each person voting individually. If the vote passes, the proposed law will move closer to becoming an actual law. Citizens should care because the Criminal Code deals with things like crimes and punishments. Changes to it could affect everyone. This vote is a step in deciding what those changes will be.

C-225Changes to Criminal Laws Proposed

Vote on Bill C-12PassedPassed Without Counting

C-12Law to tighten Canada's borders and immigration, plus other security steps

Bill C-12 is a proposed law that passed without a formal count of votes.

This vote on Bill C-12 is about whether to approve a new law about border security and immigration. The government wants to make sure Canada's borders are safe and that the immigration system is fair. This new law would let the government collect more information about people coming into Canada. They say this will help them stop criminals and terrorists. It could also affect how easily people can enter Canada or become citizens. Citizens should care because this law could change how the government protects our borders and who is allowed to come to Canada. It's important to know how these changes might affect our safety and our values as a country. Since the bill received royal assent, it has now become law.

Ways and MeansPassedPassed Without Counting

Eighth report of the Standing Committee on Public AccountsTie

This is a request to move forward with something, and it passed.

This vote is about money. Specifically, it's a step the government needs to take to be able to spend money on its plans. When the government wants to spend money, it needs Parliament's permission. This vote is a routine step in that process. It's like getting a blank check from Parliament. The government can't actually spend the money yet, but this vote gives them the go-ahead to prepare the detailed plans for how they will spend it. Citizens should care because this process is how the government funds important programs like healthcare, education, and infrastructure. It's a necessary step for the government to do anything that costs money.

SLSébastien LemireBloc Québécois

The House agreed with the Public Accounts Committee's report from March 23, 2026.

164 Yea

164 Nay

This vote is about a report from the Public Accounts Committee. This committee looks at how the government spends money. They want to make sure tax dollars are used properly. The committee wrote a report, likely about the government's spending in 2024 and 2025. They might have also looked at Bill C-230. The report probably suggests ways the government can be better at managing money. If Parliament votes "yes," it means they agree with the committee's report. The government will then need to think about the committee's ideas and make changes. This could lead to less wasteful spending and better use of your tax money.

Vote on Bill C-12PassedPassed Without Counting

C-12Law to tighten Canada's borders and immigration, plus other security steps

Bill C-12 is a proposed law to make Canada's borders and immigration rules stricter, and to add other safety measures.

This vote was about a proposed law called Bill C-12. This law aimed to make Canada's borders and immigration system stronger. It gave the government more ways to gather and share information to protect the country. Think of it like this: the government wanted to update its security measures at airports and borders. This law allowed them to do things like check people's backgrounds more carefully and share information with other countries to stop criminals and terrorists from entering Canada. This law matters because it affects who can come to Canada and how the government keeps us safe. It also raises questions about privacy, since the government would have more power to collect personal information. Citizens should care because it impacts both security and individual rights.

Vote on Bill C-8PassedPassed Without Counting

C-8Law to Enact Parts of the Government's Economic Plan and Other Changes

Bill C-8 is about to become law.

This vote on Bill C-8 is the final step in making it a real law. The members of Parliament are voting to say they agree with the proposed law. Bill C-8 is about money. It changes some taxes and how the government spends money. It follows up on a financial update from December 2021. If the vote passes, Bill C-8 becomes law. This means the tax changes and spending plans will happen. This could affect how much money people have and what government programs are available. Citizens should care because it impacts their wallets and the services they rely on.

Vote on Bill C-246 — approve in principleDefeated

C-246Law Would Increase Jail Time for Repeat Sex Offenders

Bill C-246: This proposed law would change the rules for sentencing people who commit sexual crimes, so they serve their sentences one after the other.

157 Yea

169 Nay

This vote was about a proposed law called Bill C-246. The goal of this law was to make sure people who commit multiple sex crimes get a longer prison sentence. Right now, a judge can decide if someone serves sentences for different crimes at the same time (concurrently) or one after the other (consecutively). Bill C-246 wanted to change this for sex crimes. If it passed, judges would have to order that sentences for multiple sex crimes be served one after the other. This could mean a much longer time in jail for offenders. Citizens should care because this law deals with how our justice system punishes serious crimes. Some people think tougher sentences will make our communities safer. Others believe there are better ways to prevent these crimes from happening in the first place. This vote was a chance for Members of Parliament to decide if they agreed with this approach to sentencing sex offenders. The bill was defeated, so the law will not change.

RTRachael ThomasConservative

Vote to send Bill C-9 back to committeeDefeated

C-9Law Would Toughen Penalties for Hate Speech and Crimes Targeting Religious or Cultural Sites

Bill C-9 would go back to committee to rethink part of the proposed law about hate and religion to protect religious expression and freedom.

125 Yea

188 Nay

This vote is about whether to send Bill C-9 back to a committee for more work. Bill C-9 is a proposed law that would change how Canada deals with hate speech and hate crimes. Some Members of Parliament want the committee to take another look at a specific part of the proposed law. This part deals with hate speech related to religion. They want to make sure that people can still freely express their religious beliefs without being accused of spreading hate. They are worried that the proposed law, as it is now, might accidentally punish people for expressing their faith. If this vote passes, the committee will discuss this part of Bill C-9 again and possibly make changes. This could affect how the proposed law impacts religious freedom and free speech in Canada. Citizens should care because this vote could change the balance between protecting people from hate and allowing them to freely express their opinions and beliefs, especially about religion.

LBLarry BrockConservative

Final vote on Bill C-9Passed

C-9Law Would Toughen Penalties for Hate Speech and Crimes Targeting Religious or Cultural Sites

Bill C-9 would change the rules about hate speech, hate crimes, and access to religious or cultural places.

186 Yea

137 Nay

This vote is about whether to approve Bill C-9, a proposed law that changes how Canada deals with hate. If the House of Commons votes yes, it means they agree with the proposed changes to the law. Bill C-9 wants to make it easier to punish people who spread hate, especially online. It also wants to protect places like churches, mosques, synagogues, and cultural centers from being targeted by hate crimes. This matters because it could change what you can say online without getting in trouble. It also could mean tougher penalties for crimes motivated by hate, and more protection for places of worship and culture. Citizens should care because this law could affect free speech, how hate crimes are punished, and the safety of religious and cultural spaces in their communities.

SFSean FraserLiberal

Vote on Bill C-242 — approve in principleDefeated

C-242Law Would Keep More Accused Criminals in Jail Before Trial

Bill C-242 is being discussed to change the laws about crime and the Department of Justice.

136 Yea

193 Nay

This vote was about a proposed law called Bill C-242. This law wanted to make changes to how bail works in Canada. Bail is when someone accused of a crime is released from jail while waiting for their trial. Bill C-242 aimed to make it more difficult for people accused of violent crimes to get bail. If passed, it would have meant more people accused of these crimes would stay in jail until their trial. Supporters of the bill believed it would help prevent crime and protect the public. This vote was important because it decided whether the proposed law would move forward for further consideration. Since the bill was defeated, it will not become a law. This means the current bail rules will stay the same. People who care about crime and public safety likely had strong opinions about this bill.

AKArpan KhannaConservative

Vote on Bill C-220 — approve in principleDefeated

Bill C-220 would change the rules about how a person's immigration status affects their punishment for a crime.

C-220Law Would Consider Immigration Status During Sentencing

171 Nay

This vote was about a proposed law called Bill C-220. The law wanted to change how judges decide sentences for people who have committed crimes. Right now, judges look at many things when deciding a sentence. This proposed law would have added a person's immigration status to that list. So, if someone was not a citizen, or didn't have permanent resident status, the judge would have to think about that when giving a sentence. This could have changed sentences for some people. Some people thought it would make the system fairer. Others worried it could lead to unfair treatment. The vote was to decide if the proposed law should go to a committee for more study. Since the bill was defeated, this proposed law will not move forward.

MRGMichelle Rempel GarnerConservative

Vote on Bill C-243 — approve in principleDefeated