Alexis Deschênes
- Career
- Lawyer, journalist
- Political Experience
- Candidate for the Parti Québécois in Trois-Rivières in 2014, candidate for the Parti Québécois in Bonaventure in 2022, elected Member of Parliament for Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj in 2025, elected vice chair of the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans in the 45th Canadian Parliament in 2025
- Notable
- Unseated cabinet minister Diane Lebouthillier
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Before entering federal politics, Alexis Deschênes had a career in education. He worked as a teacher and later became a school principal. Public records indicate he has declared employment income from the Centre de services scolaire René-Lévesque, a school service centre in Quebec.
Where Alexis falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
Diane Lebouthillier won with 21,817 votes (38.3%)
Total votes cast: 56,984
How does Alexis Deschênes's voting record line up with your values?
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for her contribution to the debate. I do believe we need to work toward reconciliation. Part of our job as elected officials is to reconcile competing interests. We have try to see both sides. My colleague seems to be severely downplaying the legal uncertainty resulting from the decision in the Cowichan case. While it does not resolve everything, it is true
Mr. Speaker, I want to commend my colleague's contribution to this debate. The Bloc Québécois welcomes the idea of making our democratic system more transparent and ensuring that taxpayers have a way of finding out when the government decides to write off debts. I commend his initiative and his ability to gather support across party lines, which is not nothing. Can he tell us more about the
Mr. Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague for his speech. As I listened to him, I wondered what he was actually proposing. What we are seeing here is the Conservative Party attacking guideline number 14, arguing that limitation defences were not argued. We see that it is possible for the attorney general to raise limitation arguments under common law simply by obtaining authorization from the
Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for his contribution to the debate. I thought my colleague's tone had a hint of reassurance in it, but the question I would like to ask him is this: Why has the government decided to appeal this case?
Mr. Speaker, I thank the leader of the official opposition for his contribution to the debate. My question is the following. Given that the decision is based on an interpretation of section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, and that the courts must therefore interpret that section of the Constitution, how could the government possibly provide a solution today without allowing the judicial
Mr. Speaker, I would like to draw on my colleague's expertise in the field of finance. We in the Bloc Québécois are concerned about this sovereign wealth fund. First, public funds are being invested in a framework whose lack of transparency is concerning to us. Has my colleague been able to estimate the total cost of the public funds that will need to be invested in the sovereign wealth fund,
Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask my colleague to clarify his thoughts. A few minutes ago, he told us that he believed the mechanism underlying the Canada health transfer to the provinces should be amended during future negotiations at the next federal-provincial meeting. What exactly does my colleague mean? What is he proposing? What is his opinion?
Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for his contribution. The Bloc Québécois wants to fight planned obsolescence. It is a matter of respect for consumers and for what the planet has to offer us. Right now, we are consuming at a frantic pace, and the planet is having a hard time keeping up with our demand. This bill offers a viable alternative. I did not hear my colleague mention Bill 29, which