Taleeb Noormohamed
- Born
- October 8, 1976
- Education
- BA, Princeton University; Master's, Harvard University; attended Oxford University
- Career
- Technology executive
- Political Experience
- Ran unsuccessfully in 2011 and 2019 federal elections; ran for Vision Vancouver mayoral candidacy in 2018; Member of Parliament for Vancouver Granville since 2021
- Property
- Shares in a wide variety of companies, multiple rental properties
- Notable
- First Muslim MP to be elected in British Columbia; appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Canadian Heritage in 2023; appointed Parliamentary Secretary for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation in 2025
Where Taleeb falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
Taleeb Noormohamed won with 37,010 votes (62.1%)
Total votes cast: 59,577
How does Taleeb Noormohamed's voting record line up with your values?
leader Mr. Speaker, it is sad that we have to rise in the House to even address this issue. I suppose when we are dealing with an opposition party whoseonce said that indigenous people needed a better work ethic, not support, this is what we get. There are members across the way who have made comments that have disparaged indigenous people, directly and indirectly. Their arguments about this
Mr. Speaker, I noted that in the member opposite's comments, he expressed that somehow these Musqueam agreements were secret. If he would like, I am more than happy to share with him the links online, where they are available to the public. North Island—Powell River He also spoke about the need for true reconciliation, which he alleges his party believes in. Does that strategy of true
Mr. Speaker, I think the simple answer is no. I would invite members opposite to read beyond the first line of the directive because they would see there is substantial depth there. They should choose to look at the facts. I know my hon. friend here, who is a lawyer, has read the entirety of the decision and would understand why we have to read the whole thing, not just the headlines.
Mr. Speaker, I am so pleased the member opposite chose to hang his entire argument on the word “viable”. The whole premise of our legal system is based on viable argument, on the fact that we make arguments that can stand up in court and that we win or lose decisions on the basis of the quality of our arguments and our understanding of the law. I would invite the member opposite to look at the
South Surrey—White Rock Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the member for. I rise this afternoon to speak about a court decision that has caused real worry in my province and to speak directly to the Canadians, particularly British Columbians, who have been watching this debate and wondering what it means for them and for their homes. Let us begin with the facts, because the facts have
Mr. Speaker, I thank the member opposite for yet again, like his colleagues, making light of what is a very serious situation for folks in Vancouver and across British Columbia. There are people who listen to the debates in this Parliament and expect serious discussion and serious debate. What they hear is misinformation, which leads to market uncertainty. Market uncertainty leads to builders
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, let us be clear about what the facts are. The fact is that thehas stood and said very clearly that our government is going to protect private property rights. Let us be clear about the facts. We have said that we are appealing the decision, which we are. Let us also be clear that the fearmongering and misinformation coming from the other side of the House is causing
Mr. Speaker, this May, Canadians mark Asian Heritage Month, and someone who comes from a city like Vancouver, as I do, does not have to look far to understand why that matters. There is no one Asian story in Canada; there are tens of thousands. They are written in many languages, carried through many faiths, shaped by many histories and lived through families that crossed oceans, built lives