Michael Guglielmin

Mr. Speaker, it is another week, another letter sent to Cleveland-Cliffs, yet workers are still facing layoffs. industry minister Now, on October 26, thesaid she would provide the House with the demand letter that outlines the numerous breaches Cleveland-Cliffs made in its contract, yet she has not followed through. I have asked for that letter repeatedly in the House, yet parliamentarians still [more]

minister Mr. Speaker, thekeeps sending letters and moving deadlines, but what workers really need is a more competitive industry. Conservatives have offered some concrete solutions, like pre-approving LNG projects so we can signal demand to industry for Canadian steel and getting rid of the industrial carbon tax. We have also argued for regulatory and tax reform. Will the Liberals today commit [more]

Mr. Speaker, earlier today, we heard the Governor of the Bank of Canada, at committee, talk about the importance of governments having a plan, the importance of fiscal anchors and framework, and the signals to the market if one fails to meet those fiscal anchors. It appears that the government is likely going to blow through one of its fiscal anchors. I am curious as to what my colleague thinks [more]

Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this opportunity to recognize the rose scholarship, a scholarship put on by a good friend of mine, Andrew Addorisio, and his wife, Sarah Addorisio. It was inspired by his mother, Rosella Addorisio. This scholarship aims to help underprivileged youth that face barriers to education and the things they are trying to achieve. I want to congratulate them on [more]

Mr. Speaker, there is a principle we often talk about, which is, what is in the government's control that it could address today? My colleague would know this quite well from when she was a member on this side of the House. She would have been a strong advocate for supply-side principles. This includes things like tax reform, regulatory reform and things that would create the conditions for [more]

Mr. Speaker, this is a theme that we have heard over and over again. Time and time again, we have heard the Liberals say they are going to be investing in the economy and they are going to be investing to grow, but we have seen the deficit climb higher and higher, and our public debt climb higher and higher. It is interesting that, on the debt-to-GDP ratio, we often hear the government cite net [more]

Mr. Speaker, obviously, my family, the member's family and many families that have come to this country as immigrants share a similar story. They came here, they worked hard and they wanted a better future for their families, for their children and their children's children. The question now becomes, what exactly should government be focusing on today? There are numerous things. We need to get [more]

Mr. Speaker, I cannot understand for the life of me why the minister cannot answer the very simple question. The father of the family who just suffered the violent home invasion in Toronto said the following: “It is difficult to put into words the trauma of experiencing something so horrific in the one place where everyone should feel safest: their own home.” That is why we put these two bills [more]

Mr. Speaker, according to the Toronto Star, home invasions are up 50% in Toronto. Canadians want action. That is why we have two bills before the House. We have the proposed safe at home act, which would create a stand-alone offence for home invasions and carry with it a mandatory minimum of five years and a maximum of life imprisonment. We also have the proposed stand on guard law, which would [more]

Mr. Speaker, there was heartbreaking news out of Toronto this morning. Three masked suspects armed with handguns and a hammer forced their way into a family's home, and a father and his two daughters were shot. This is the kind of chaos that Canadians are facing. It is time for the Liberals to pass our stand on guard act and our safe at home bill that would strengthen protections for Canadians by [more]

Mr. Speaker, on Monday, the industry minister said she would provide the demand letter she sent to Cleveland-Cliffs, because it outlines the way in which the company has breached its contractual commitments. Yesterday, I stood up in the House and asked her for a date on which she would provide us with that letter. She did not answer the question. Meanwhile, we hear from Cleveland-Cliffs [more]