Mario Beaulieu
- Born
- February 1, 1959 — Sherbrooke
- Political Experience
- President of the Parti Québécois's riding association in Montreal Centre from 1997 to 2002; Unsuccessful Bloc Québécois candidate in the 1997 federal election; 80th president of the sovereignist Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste of Montreal from 2009 to 2014; president (2014–2018), interim leader (2018–2019) and leader (2014–2015) of the Bloc Québécois; MP for La Pointe-de-l'Île since the 2015 election.
- Notable
- Spokesman for the Mouvement Québec français; Advocate for strengthening measures requiring the predominance of the French language in Quebec, as well as for Quebec independence.
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Before entering federal politics, Mario Beaulieu was a prominent figure in Quebec's sovereigntist movement. He served as the president of the Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Montréal from 2009 to 2014. He was also a spokesperson for the Mouvement Québec français, an organization dedicated to promoting the French language in Quebec. His career has been primarily focused on activism and roles within these nationalist organizations rather than private business.
Key Relationships & Connections
Mario Beaulieu's key relationships are rooted in the Quebec sovereignty movement. He has worked closely with various figures within the Bloc Québécois, a party he led from 2014 to 2015 before stepping down. He was succeeded by Gilles Duceppe, who returned to lead the party into the 2015 election. He also has long-standing connections with leaders and members of organizations like the Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste and the Mouvement Québec français, where he held leadership positions.
Public Controversies
Mario Beaulieu's tenure as leader of the Bloc Québécois in 2014 was marked by controversy. Critics, including some within the sovereigntist movement, described his political style as hardline and divisive. He faced criticism for a speech in which he punched his fist in the air while saying "nous vaincrons" (we will conquer), a phrase some commentators linked to the Front de libération du Québec (FLQ). Beaulieu defended his words as a common political expression. His leadership reportedly caused internal strife, leading to the departure of two sitting Bloc Québécois MPs, Jean-François Fortin and André Bellavance, who chose to leave the party caucus. Several potential candidates also withdrew their names from consideration for the upcoming election, citing disagreements with his leadership style. These events contributed to his decision to step down as leader in 2015.
Where Mario falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
Mario Beaulieu won with 22,940 votes (43.1%)
Total votes cast: 53,209
How does Mario Beaulieu's voting record line up with your values?
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise today to recognize the Santé-Marche Roussin group in my riding, La Pointe-de-l'Île. It is a walking club for people aged 50 and older, affiliated with the Roussin community centre in Pointe-aux-Trembles. Rain or shine, for the past 32 years, folks have been getting together every morning, Monday through Friday at 9 a.m., at Pointe-aux-Prairies park to walk as a
Mr. Speaker, does my colleague agree that we should study the issue either at the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs or at a special committee, as the Conservatives suggest?
Mr. Speaker, earlier, I asked why we are not debating this issue at the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs. I was told that it got shut down. My Bloc colleague who serves on the committee told me that, to her knowledge, this was not true and that the motion for a study had simply been moved. The committee met this morning and the motion was not brought forward again. If the
Mr. Speaker, we do not have this problem in Quebec because of the province's civil law tradition. Why does my colleague think that everything is happening in secret like this? I think the point of setting up a committee is to be able to debate this issue transparently. Why does he think the government seems to be opposed to that?
Mr. Speaker, it is true that it is important to clarify the issue and debate it. Why do the Conservatives think that we cannot have this debate at the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs?
Mr. Speaker, the Conservative motion states that the committee should study the issue over at least 12 meetings but that the report should be tabled before June 19. Given that this is such a complex and important topic, would it not be appropriate to extend that deadline to the fall, if necessary, to ensure that members can discuss the issues in depth?
Mr. Speaker, I want to commend my colleague on her excellent speech, which shows her in-depth knowledge of the issue. She already talked about the fact that I asked why the motion was not brought up in committee and that I was told that it was defeated. It appears that is not the case. Can my colleague tell us more about the changes we would like to make to the motion and about the way to create
Mr. Speaker, I would like to know why the government is stubbornly refusing to give victims the freedom to choose between a court martial and a civilian court. Why did the government ignore the amendments that the opposition members seemed to support quite unanimously? What does my colleague think?