Skip to main content
Parliament returns Wednesday, May 20
Bloc Québécois

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau

Bloc QuébécoisLaurentides—LabelleQuebec
1040Votes Cast
20Speeches
0Bills Sponsored
Background
Born
November 24, 1976
Family
Married and a mother of two
Career
Member of the Caisses Desjardins council in Les Hautes-Laurentides, founder of Table Forêt Laurentides, worked for the CSSS Antoine-Labelle
Political Experience
Elected to the House of Commons in 2019, caucus chair in the Bloc Québécois Shadow Cabinet from 2021 to 2025, vice president of the Procedure and House Affairs committee
Property
Owner of a Recreational Centre in Mont-Laurier
Notable
Vice chair of the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs and the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates in the 45th Canadian Parliament in 2025. Bloc Québécois critic for Tourism and Children and Families.
Public Profile

Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies

Business & Financial Interests

Before entering federal politics, Marie-Hélène Gaudreau had a career in communications and public relations. She reportedly worked as a communications advisor for the City of Mont-Laurier. She also served as a political attaché for the former Bloc Québécois Member of Parliament for her riding, Johanne Deschamps.

Committee Memberships
Where Marie-Hélène Stands

Where Marie-Hélène falls on key policy spectrums

They vote

Your Money

Taxes & Government SpendingBusiness & Worker RulesEnergy & the Economy

People & Society

HealthcareImmigrationIndigenous PeoplesIdentity & Human RightsEducation & ChildcareDrug Policy

How We're Governed

National Security & DefencePolitical & Electoral ReformCrime & Public SafetyFirearms

Land & Community

Environment, Climate & ResourcesHousing & Cost of LivingRural Communities & Culture
They vote
Riding
House Seat
2025 Election Results — Laurentides—Labelle

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau won with 23,615 votes (44.6%)

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau(Bloc Québécois)23,615 (44.6%)
Emrick Vienneau(Liberal)18,514 (34.9%)
Daniel Paquette(Conservative)7,900 (14.9%)
Michel Noël De Tilly(NDP-New Democratic Party)1,341 (2.5%)
Michel Le Comte(Green Party)864 (1.6%)
Amélie Charbonneau(People's Party)749 (1.4%)

Total votes cast: 52,983

How does Marie-Hélène Gaudreau's voting record line up with your values?

Set 3 priorities
Recent Activity
May 4, 2026
InterjectionReport Stage

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals give the impression that they are listening, while silently thinking to themselves that they have a trick up their sleeve. They even said that we were traumatizing the people who came to give evidence all over again. I have heard that so many times. Then, when they realize that this sort of incident is not an isolated one, they have to keep it under wraps. What do they

May 4, 2026
InterjectionReport Stage

Mr. Speaker, everywhere we turn, we hear about investments or about “building Canada strong”, whether during elections or government announcements, while the veterans affairs budget has been cut by 15%. Do not try to tell me that the government sees them, hears them, believes them. The government definitely does not want to help veterans.

May 4, 2026
DebateReport Stage

C‑11 Mr. Speaker, not long ago, on October 8, I spoke here in the House about Bill. My background in social psychology means that I have a specific perspective when it comes to victims, actions and their impact. Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton In particular, I want to commend my colleague frombecause he and his colleagues had an opportunity to meet with victims, which allowed them to see that the

May 4, 2026
InterjectionReport Stage

Mr. Speaker, I also appreciate my colleague's work. Why is this not done on a case-by-case basis? Proposals are heard, a preliminary study is done, there is an assessment, and then a decision is made based on need and on what is proposed. When we all agree and then they say that it is wrong, that we should forget about it, that is like telling the minister that he will have the right to do

Apr 29, 2026
InterjectionPreventing Coercion of Persons Not Seeking Medical Assistance in Dying Act

Mr. Speaker, we all have different abilities to focus. I tend to hear everything and see everything. It may be a character flaw, but noise bothers me. Members do not have to listen, but I would ask them to be quiet. I will continue by sharing what I experienced and what I have seen over the past few years. I hope that my colleague who introduced this bill has had the opportunity to openly

Apr 29, 2026
QuestionPreventing Coercion of Persons Not Seeking Medical Assistance in Dying Act

Mr. Speaker, I listened to my colleague's speech. The intent of the bill is to amend the Criminal Code to make it an offence for certain people, in an end-of-life situation, to initiate a discussion about all the options available to a person who is suffering. This is based on discussions. Instead of the offence being based on an employee's behaviour, something else should be done. There are

Apr 29, 2026
QuestionPreventing Coercion of Persons Not Seeking Medical Assistance in Dying Act

Mr. Speaker, I am deeply moved by the topic of our discussion. Allow me to explain why. I will start by asking those present and those watching at home to raise their hand if they have cared for someone at the end of their life who sought medical assistance in dying. We are not alone. We can ask people who have lived through the experience and people who are as afraid of this word as they are of