Kevin Lamoureux
- Born
- January 22, 1962 — Winnipeg, Manitoba
- Education
- University of Winnipeg
- Career
- Store manager, air traffic control assistant, served in the armed forces for three years
- Political Experience
- Member of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba from 1988 to 1999 and from 2003 to 2010; twice sought the leadership of the Manitoba Liberal Party; elected to the House of Commons of Canada for the constituency of Winnipeg North in 2010
- Notable
- Younger brother, Darrin Lamoureux, was the leader of the Saskatchewan Liberal Party from 2013 to 2017. His daughter, Cindy Lamoureux, is an MLA in northwest Winnipeg.
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Before entering politics, Kevin Lamoureux served in the Canadian Armed Forces (Air Command). According to public disclosures filed with the Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, he has declared rental income from a property located in Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Key Relationships & Connections
Kevin Lamoureux has a notable family connection in politics, as his daughter, Cindy Lamoureux, is a Member of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba, also representing the Liberal Party. Within the federal government, he has served as the Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, a role that involves working closely with the government's legislative leadership team.
Public Controversies
In 2017, Lamoureux faced criticism after he was seen on camera clapping as a protester was removed from the House of Commons gallery. He later apologized, stating that he was applauding the Sergeant-at-Arms for handling the situation professionally and not celebrating the protester's removal. In 2021, during a debate in the House of Commons, he accused the Conservative Party of wanting to "work with racists." The Speaker of the House intervened, and Lamoureux withdrew the remark and apologized.
Where Kevin falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
How does Kevin Lamoureux's voting record line up with your values?
Mr. Speaker, I addressed the issue of collaboration at the very beginning of my comments. I talked about how, at the first opportunity we had when we had a majority of members on the floor of the House of Commons, the first action that was taken was the passage of Bailey's law, which was a Conservative private member's bill. We have the silver alert legislation, which is again another
Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives talk about jobs, but in reality, they do not want us to do anything. Listen to what the Conservatives say. Their policies, in one word, suck. Let me tell members something. When we look at what this government has done over the last year, we see that we have been building major projects, looking to expand export opportunities and bringing billions of dollars in
Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all remaining questions be allowed to stand at this time.
Mr. Speaker, I have confidence, given the direction from Madam Arbour, that for offences that take place outside Canada there is a role for the military police, and that they are more than capable of fulfilling that role, such as the gathering of evidence and working with civilian authorities back in Canada. I think that is the right direction, as has been instructed by Madam Arbour's report,
Mr. Speaker, I will give it my best shot. It is because of a specific recommendation. Justice Arbour knew, consulted and worked with hundreds if not thousands of people, directly or indirectly, including victims. Her recommendation says that these offences “should be prosecuted exclusively in civilian criminal courts in all cases.” There is an exemption if it takes place outside of Canada. I
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8)(a), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to 12 petitions. These returns will be tabled in an electronic format.
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, unlike the Conservatives, theand the government understand the real value of our public health care system. One of the wonderful initiatives we are taking is investing $5 billion over three years to improve the infrastructure of our health care systems. These are things such as improvements to emergency services, hospital capital and other health care facilities, so
974 975 976 977 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 978 Mr. Speaker, if the government's responses to Questions Nos.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and, and a response to Starred Question No., could be made orders for return, these returns would be tabled in an electronic format immediately.
Mr. Speaker, in one sense, I am encouraged that the Bloc members are going to be supporting the legislation, recognizing that we do need to take cases of sexual assaults and abuse out of the military system and put them into the civilian justice system. That is encouraging. I hope to address the concerns of the member and of the previous speaker in my comments shortly. I would reinforce that the
C‑11 Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to rise to speak to Billand to share a few thoughts. I would like to address both the previous speakers from the Bloc, who talked about the government since it has become a majority. I want to be very respectful. The last member spoke about when a bill goes to committee and whether she should prepare amendments, as she is not sure whether the amendments would
Mr. Speaker, I truly appreciate the question because I think it goes two ways. The government has a responsibility. We are living up to that responsibility. Again, I will reinforce that, after this bill passes, the 48 recommendations will in fact be put in place. They are respectful, inclusive and absolutely critical. We need to continue to support our forces in the manner in which we have over
Mr. Speaker, I believe the recommendation is fairly clear. It is recommendation number five from the Arbour report. I recommend that the member opposite read the recommendation. I do believe that military police, in dealing with the issue outside of Canada, have a level of expertise in collecting and protecting the integrity of evidence and securing the situation so that we can ultimately see
Mr. Speaker, I suspect if you were to canvass the House, you would find unanimous consent at this time to call it 1:30 p.m. so we could begin private member's hour.
Mr. Speaker, we heard a lot about the consultations that have taken place. I would refer the member to Justice Arbour's report and the amount of work involved in the presentation of that report. I have made reference to the 48 recommendations in total, of which I believe three dozen have been implemented. The essence of this bill deals with one specific recommendation that is based on literally
C-11 Mr. Speaker, I must say I am not surprised, but I am disappointed in the Conservatives for their position on Bill. I think they undervalue the tremendous work that former Justice Arbour did in providing the recommendations that the essence of the legislation is all about. There were 48 recommendations. I believe 36 of them have already been implemented. At the core is the transfer of cases
Mr. Speaker, can the Conservative Party now confirm that it wants us to go back to the old system and not have the civilian justice system involved?
Vancouver Quadra Mr. Speaker, I had a good discussion with the member for. The concern that he raised, and I fully agree with him, about this attempt by the Conservative Party is the damage it would do to things like reconciliation between indigenous people and Canada. There is a very negative side to what the Conservatives are putting on the table. I wonder if the member could provide his
Mr. Speaker, the essence of the motion that we have before us today is that it is trying to give the false impression that the government does not support private land rights, which is just not the case. Every Conservative member knows that. Prime Minister minister The damage of bringing forward motions of this nature, which significantly mislead Canadians, has a great cost. We talk a great deal
C-230 Mr. Speaker, I applaud the member for his general approach in dealing with Bill. He has identified an issue that has been a priority for the government, and he has put forward something, working in a collaborative fashion. Some changes were made at the committee stage. He might have like to have added a little more value from his perspective, but he put forward the idea of working in
Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all questions be allowed to stand.