Jasraj Hallan
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Before being elected to Parliament, Jasraj Hallan was a small business owner in Calgary, Alberta. He reportedly worked as a master builder and operated a custom home building business. According to his disclosure summary with the Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, he has declared ownership in a private corporation named J. Hallan Inc.
Key Relationships & Connections
As a member of the Conservative Party, Jasraj Hallan is a key political ally of party leader Pierre Poilievre. Poilievre has appointed Hallan to prominent roles in the Conservative shadow cabinet, including serving as the Shadow Minister for Finance. This position makes him a leading voice for the party on economic and financial matters.
Public Controversies
In late 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Hallan reportedly travelled to California despite public health advisories against non-essential travel. He stated the trip was to visit a sick family member. He has also faced public criticism for his statements linking the federal carbon tax to increased food bank usage. Some food bank organizations have publicly stated that while the cost of living is a factor, the reasons for rising food bank use are complex and cannot be attributed to a single policy.
Where Jasraj falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
How does Jasraj Hallan's voting record line up with your values?
Mr. Speaker, stalling the economy for two quarters is success to these guys. I would hate to see what failure looks like. Canadians want relief at the pump right now. Conservatives know every dollar that Canadians save at the pump on gas means more money that they can spend on groceries. That is why Conservatives are calling on this incompetent Liberal government to remove all Liberal fuel taxes
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, the out-of-touch Liberalsaid affordability is the best it has been in a decade. I would say that too if I owned shares in Brookfield. While he is hiking gas taxes, families are struggling with whether they can afford groceries or gas this week. We know the Prime Minister does not control world prices, but he does control Liberal taxes on gas, like the clean fuel
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, the measure of a success in this country should be how many government programs Canadians get off, not get put on to. Debt interest is the fastest-growing expense, more than health care and more than the military. It is the money that gets sent to the's banker, bondholder and Brookfield buddies every single year. This guy said he would spend less, but he is all talk
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, like a typical Liberal elitist, theis sending more money to his banker, bondholder and Brookfield buddies in debt interest than what goes to provinces in health care transfers. Just this year, a family of four will pay $6,000 in debt interest. Justin Trudeau doubled the debt. The Prime Minister took that as a challenge. He doubled down and doubled his deficit. Prime
Mr. Speaker, that answer should be treated like fraud. The fact that the bank had to stop future payments and not the CRA speaks volumes to how bad these guys have messed up the CRA. They will give their Liberal-connected insiders millions of dollars in tax-free writeoffs if they are connected to their green slush fund scandal, but they will fleece Canadians for every single dollar. The CRA
Mr. Speaker, the Liberals set a gold standard for incompetence at the CRA. A so-called sovereign citizen stole $10 million from the CRA. He called and told them he was going to commit the scam, and they gave him the money anyway. The bank had to stop future payments, not the CRA, even though it was known that he was committing the scam. finance minister The CBC claims that there is around $300
Yes, Chair, we'll submit that.
First, Mr. Turnbull was not exactly correct in saying that this is already provided. If we're asking for the information in paragraph 7(6)(c), I imagine that it would be helpful to have it all in one place, rather than going through another report, for whatever government is making future decisions on whether the program is feasible or whether it's working out or not. Is that correct? Would it
The reason we're moving it forward is that we've tried over and over again to save Canadians more money, especially with summer coming up. There's a Liberal cost of living crisis in this country. Everything is up. Costs are up. Taxes are up. Having the government double Justin Trudeau's deficit did not help Canadians either. We have one of the highest food inflations in the entire G7. We have the