Jamil Jivani

Mr. Speaker, hello, everyone. It is nice to be here with all of us— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!

AI minister Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, we see another example of the Liberals deflecting and dodging a very important question about $2.3 billion of taxpayer money. What we are pointing out is that thetook the correct steps of adding Telesat CEO Dan Goldberg to his ethics screen. The question is why thecannot do the same. Their personal friend Dan Goldberg has been personally enriched by a [more]

AI minister Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, the, theand the Telesat CEO are all buddies. They sent their kids to the same elite private school. They are in the same book and running club. They even ran a marathon together. The AI minister took the correct steps of adding Dan Goldberg to his ethics screen. Prime Minister Why will thenot do the same? AI minister If thecan do it, why can the Prime [more]

Mr. Speaker, I do think, ideally, the legislation would be split. If not, a vote split would be a great idea. Anything that we can do to highlight the weight of every part of this legislation, the moral and medical significance of it, would be welcomed.

Mr. Speaker, there are a lot of concerns, as he accurately raised. We hear from the government terms like “safeguards” to give the impression that there are appropriate safeguards already in place in the euthanasia regime in this country. I would never cite the United Nations in almost any other circumstance but since we have a government that likes to appeal to international organizations like [more]

Prime Minister AI minister Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, Canadians have questions about the $2.3-billion contract given out to Telesat. Its CEO, Dan Goldberg, is close personal friends with the. Liberals were deflecting questions about this earlier today, but the core question is this: Why is theincluding Dan Goldberg in his ethics screen but theis unwilling to do the exact same? Canadians want to [more]

Mr. Speaker, with all due respect, the member opposite has asked a very silly question. We have been very clear in saying people should make the choice in the moment that death is being presented to them as an option by their government through the health care system. We are not taking the choice away. We are saying do not hold them to a decision they may have made years prior under different [more]

Mr. Speaker, I agree that using language is important, which is why I call it euthanasia. MAID is an acronym and a term made to sanitize something that is morally very consequential. I think it was used by the government to take something that is very disturbing to many Canadians and make it sound innocuous. It is not innocuous. It is euthanasia. It is about people's lives being ended. This is [more]

Mr. Speaker, I would like to begin my comments today by reiterating a request that has been made by many of my colleagues here in the House of Commons, which is to split the bill. C-41 Billis a real moral dilemma. The way it has been politically manipulated is of great concern. It is only by splitting the bill into two separate decisions, two separate votes by members of the House, that I think [more]

Mr. Speaker, I rise today on behalf of the great people of Bowmanville—Oshawa North to discuss the urgent and important matter of youth unemployment. There are a lot of statistics that get referred to when we talk about this issue, and those statistics are very important, but I also want to spend some time talking about the people and the lives behind those numbers. To paint a broad picture, as [more]

Mr. Speaker, it is time for the Liberal government to reflect on the fact that the Canadian people are not falling for this anymore. The Liberals are being held accountable for what they have done. Prime Minister Premier Eby just lost an election in British Columbia pulling the same shenanigans that thetries to do, which is to blame all of Canada's problems on another country and take no [more]

Mr. Speaker, for young people who are facing a whole heap of challenges, as I did growing up, like those who come from a broken home, are dealing with all sorts of economic instability or have trauma that they are processing at a very young age, a job is a life raft of normalcy. It is a pathway to being part of society when they may feel very isolated and pushed away by life circumstances. When [more]