Andrew Lawton
- Born
- January 14, 1978 — Melbourne, Australia
- Family
- Married to Darcy Lawton, two children
- Education
- The University of Melbourne; Sarah Lawrence College in New York
- Career
- Film director, television director, screenwriter, and actor; owner and creative director of Kinetic Studios
- Notable
- Former member of The Victorian Boys Choir
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Before entering politics, Andrew Lawton was a journalist, broadcaster, and author. He hosted a radio talk show for Corus Radio and later worked as a fellow and host for the True North Centre for Public Policy, a conservative media organization. He has also authored a book about the 'Freedom Convoy' protest.
Key Relationships & Connections
Andrew Lawton has a documented connection to the True North Centre for Public Policy, where he was a prominent fellow and media personality before his election. As a Member of Parliament, he is part of the Conservative Party caucus led by Pierre Poilievre.
Public Controversies
Andrew Lawton has faced significant public controversy over past statements and social media posts made before he was an MP. Critics have described some of his past online comments as homophobic, misogynistic, and Islamophobic. Lawton has publicly addressed these controversies, stating that the comments were made during a period when he was struggling with mental illness and that they do not reflect his current views. He has reportedly apologized for some of the posts. His past commentary on topics such as Canada's residential school system has also drawn criticism.
Where Andrew falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
How does Andrew Lawton's voting record line up with your values?
Mr. Speaker, food affordability remains a serious challenge for families in my community and across the country. Today, I want to recognize some of the unsung heroes who are meeting that challenge head-on. Founded just six years ago by Jim and Jacintha Collins, Harvest Hands in St. Thomas has rescued more than 45 million dollars' worth of surplus food, nearly $20 million last year alone. What
Mr. Speaker, we also have a new record: the most hot air from a transport minister. The Liberals rejected Conservative calls to axe all federal taxes on fuel and save Canadians 25¢ a litre at the pumps. Let us look at what the Liberals do have money for: $200 million for a gravel pit, or, sorry, a launch pad, when the only thing the Liberals are sending into the stratosphere is the national
Prime Minister health minister Mr. Speaker, once again theis padding the pockets of consultants, insiders and elites while Canadians pay the price for his costly credit card budget. The Liberals blew $300 million on PrescribeIT with nothing to show for it. They said they were going to axe the fax, but instead they just embraced the waste. Now we learn that thepaid the Liberal-appointed head of
Where it says, “minimum punishment would amount to cruel and unusual punishment for that offender”, they're deciding whether it's cruel and unusual not only based on the facts of the crime, but also based on the circumstances of the offender, as I read that. What is being drawn into that assessment?
If a judge believes an offender's immigration status could be jeopardized by upholding the mandatory minimum, could that be factored into cruel and unusual punishment being determined?
With regret, I have a very brief point of order. In light of the motion we just passed, are there any deadlines that we need to be made aware of to submit witness names to the committee?
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. Mr. Mantle C-16 We're debating here the subamendment that was put forth on Monday by. It's a substitution for an amendment from Mr. Baber on clause 63. This is the clause dealing with the so-called safety valve that the Liberals have opted to put in Billto tremendously weaken the force and effect of mandatory minimum penalties. Mr. Baber's amendment would add:
Would an offender's immigration status be considered?
When determining whether the circumstances are cruel and unusual, there is nothing in proposed subsection 718.4(1), nothing in the safety valve, that compels judges to look at the effects it would have on victims and their rights.
I will look up some of the cases you've cited. Please add me back to the speakers list, Mr. Chair. I'm finished right now.