Andréanne Larouche
- Political Experience
- Elected to the House of Commons of Canada in the 2019 election. Served as the critic of seniors, the status of Women and gender equality in the Bloc Québécois Shadow Cabinet of the 44th Parliament of Canada. Elected vice chair of the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on the Status of Women in the 45th Canadian Parliament in 2025.
Based on publicly available information — may contain inaccuracies
Business & Financial Interests
Before entering federal politics, Andréanne Larouche had a career in the health and social services sector. She worked as a rehabilitation counsellor, notably for the Centre de santé et de services sociaux (CSSS) de la Haute-Yamaska. She also has experience in politics, having previously worked as a political attaché for Jean-François Fortin, who was a Bloc Québécois Member of Parliament at the time. This role provided her with direct experience in the operations of a federal MP's office.
Key Relationships & Connections
Andréanne Larouche's entry into federal politics was influenced by her work as a political attaché for Jean-François Fortin, a former Bloc Québécois MP. This professional relationship provided her with mentorship and experience within the federal political system before she was elected herself.
Where Andréanne falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
Andréanne Larouche won with 26,726 votes (40.1%)
Total votes cast: 66,631
How does Andréanne Larouche's voting record line up with your values?
Mr. Speaker, my colleague herself raised the issue of health transfers. In a few minutes—we can hear the buzz in the House—the budget will be presented. We know that Quebec's request, made earlier this week, has two priorities. Quebec's new finance minister has asked for the current health transfer agreement to be renewed. It is set to expire next spring. Minister Marceau is also asking that the
Mr. Speaker, I will be brief. Health is a jurisdiction that belongs to Quebec and the provinces. We fail to see how this bill can truly establish data interoperability while also respecting Quebec's jurisdictions. The Bloc Québécois is issuing this fairly serious warning given that we have not yet received sufficient guarantees. Has my colleague also noted the risks involved in failing to
Mr. Speaker, my question is simple. We heard that there was a lack of data and that there was no basis for it. Can my colleague, a member from Quebec, give us more details about the data and the serious approach undertaken by the Select Committee on Dying with Dignity? A report was published on this issue in Quebec.
Mr. Speaker, I am hearing some interesting things this evening. There is a problem here. I wonder whether my colleague fully appreciates the clinical approach that underpins all of this. Right up until the very end, physicians support patients and ask whether this is still what they want. Quebec is prepared when it comes to advance requests. I have two—
Mr. Speaker, this evening, I cannot help but feel that there is a great deal of hypocrisy in this House. On the one hand, we know exactly where the Conservatives stand. On the other, the Liberals' position is far less clear. In Quebec, however, things are clear. In fact, this morning I heard on the news that Quebec reached an objective decision through a non-partisan commission that examined the
Mr. Speaker, today the Bloc Québécois is marking national caregiver week. t is an opportunity for us, as a society, to thank those who care for loved ones who have lost their independence for all the unseen work they do out of love. It is also an opportunity to remind caregivers, the vast majority of whom are women, of the importance of looking after themselves. I encourage them to look after
Mr. Speaker, I would like to make a comment and ask a question. The Standing Committee on the Status of Women's last two studies have addressed the issue of social media. When we looked at this issue as part of our study on the rise of masculinism and anti-feminism, witnesses told us that we needed to find a way to better legislate online behaviour, such as cyber-violence. C-34 The committee is
Madam Speaker, I have a question. The Bloc Québécois wants this bill to go to committee so we can take a closer look at the commission that the government proposes to establish under this bill. This commission would be responsible for reviewing cases. However, the powers that would be granted to it appear to be quite extensive. It would be able to conduct inspections, summon witnesses and impose
Madam Speaker, I am accustomed to working with my colleague from Trois‑Rivières on the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, also known as HUMA. We work well together. We agree on one thing: Maintaining the status quo is no longer an option. She talked about her experience as a mother. As the godmother of a young adult,
Madam Speaker, as I said earlier during my question, the Standing Committee on the Status of Women is studying similar issues, and the issue here is not a simple one. It concerns youth and education. These are matters under the jurisdiction of Quebec and the provinces. The Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage warned the government against the temptation to act alone. As proof, it even made a
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague, with whom I always enjoy speaking. We worked together again today in committee. I congratulate her on her French. In any case, trying to impose a one-size-fits-all approach and interfere with the training already provided in Quebec—with something that is already being done—is certainly not the way to help young people find jobs. At the federal level, there may