Skip to main content
Parliament returns Wednesday, May 20
Back to Bills
S-209At second reading in the House of Commons

Bill S-209 — Law Would Limit Kids' Access to Porn Online

Limit Kids' Access to Porn

Introduced Apr 30, 2026
Summary

This proposed law, S-209, wants to make it harder for young people to see pornography online. It would change how websites work. Websites that show porn would need to make sure visitors are old enough. They might need to ask for proof of age before letting people see the content. This proposed law would affect anyone who uses the internet in Canada, especially kids and adults who visit adult websites. It would also affect the companies that run these websites. They would need to add age verification systems. This matters because many people worry about children being exposed to pornography too early. Supporters of the proposed law believe it will help protect kids from harmful content. Others might worry about how easy it will be to check ages online and whether it will affect adults' privacy.

What MPs Are Saying
Conservative
Kerry DiotteConservativeNeutral

I think it is hard to protect kids online. We need to find the right balance so the government does not have too much or too little control. I am worried about how to do this.

Bill Timeline
Introduced in the Senate
May 27, 2025
Approved in principle (Senate)
Jun 12, 2025
Passed the Senate
Apr 15, 2026
Introduced in the House
Apr 30, 2026
Where This Lands on Key Issues

Where this proposed law falls on the policy spectrums that Canadians care about

Set your 3 priorities to see how this bill aligns with what you care about.

Sign up free — 30 sec
Bill Quality
Solid

This proposed law aims to protect young people from online pornography by penalizing commercial websites that don't verify ages. It also sets up a process for enforcement and allows for court orders to block access, but relies on future regulations for key details like age verification methods.

Things to Watch For

  • The specific methods for age verification are not defined in the law itself.
  • It's unclear how effective age verification will be in practice.
  • The definition of 'commercial purposes' needs to be clear to avoid unintended targets.
  • The law does not address non-commercial sources of pornography.
  • The impact on free speech and access to information needs to be considered.
  • The process for appealing or challenging a notice is not detailed.
  • The law relies on internet service providers to enforce court orders, which could raise privacy concerns.
Progress

Click any step to learn what it means

What Do You Think?

Loading...

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments...