Skip to main content
Parliament returns Wednesday, May 20
Back to Bills
C-275Outside the Order of Precedence

Bill C-275 — Law Would Change How Sexual Assault Evidence Is Handled

Changes to Sexual Assault Evidence Rules

Introduced Apr 28, 2026
Summary

This proposed law focuses on recordings of sexual assault. It calls these recordings "sexual assault material." This means videos or photos that clearly show sexual acts happening without consent. The proposed law would make it a crime to create, share, or have these recordings. If you make or share them, you could face up to 14 years in jail and a $100,000 fine. Even just having these recordings could lead to 5 years in jail and a $50,000 fine. Even accessing the material could lead to 10 years in jail and a $50,000 fine. There are some exceptions. For example, if the material is used for legal, medical, or educational reasons, it might be allowed. This matters because it aims to protect people from the harm caused by these recordings. It also sends a message that making and sharing these recordings is a serious crime. It could affect anyone who creates, shares, or possesses this type of material. It also affects victims of sexual assault, as it aims to prevent the spread of recordings that violate their privacy and dignity.

Bill Timeline
Introduced in the House
Apr 28, 2026
Where This Lands on Key Issues

Where this proposed law falls on the policy spectrums that Canadians care about

Set your 3 priorities to see how this bill aligns with what you care about.

Sign up free — 30 sec
Bill Quality
Solid

This proposed law creates new crimes for making, sharing, or possessing visual recordings of sexual assault. It also tries to protect people by saying it's not a valid defense to claim you thought the assault was consensual, unless you took steps to confirm it was.

Things to Watch For

  • The definition of 'sexual assault material' could be interpreted differently by different people.
  • It is unclear how 'reasonable steps to ascertain consent' will be defined and proven in court.
  • The penalties for accessing the material are different than for possessing it, but the difference is not explained.
  • The law does not say who will be responsible for enforcing these new rules.
  • The law does not address whether platforms hosting this material will be held responsible.
Progress

Click any step to learn what it means

What Do You Think?

Loading...

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments...